QVOSQuality that keeps pace.Practical testing and quality support for Australian businesses.
Preparing a release, coordinating user acceptance testing or checking an AI tool? QVOS helps you understand what has been tested, where the risks sit and what needs attention next.
See how a convincing AI answer can get a business decision wrong. Takes about 3 minutes.
AI QUALITY & READINESS
Internal support assistant
Fictional business · Example assessment
Ongoing testing support, a focused assessment or help leading the work. Start with the problem you need to solve.
A scoped testing engagement for teams that need practical quality support.
Support allocation, timing and responsibilities are agreed in the proposal. Work is scheduled to the agreed scope and available capacity.
From A$3,500 + GST
Discuss this service : QA as a ServiceA clear view of the evidence and open risks before a planned release.
Coverage and timing depend on the system, access and agreed test scope. Your business retains the release decision.
From A$7,500 + GST
Discuss this service : Release Readiness AssessmentMake testing more consistent, visible and useful to your delivery team.
The engagement is scoped to your priorities. Regulatory compliance audits and certification are not included.
From A$10,000 + GST
Discuss this service : Test Strategy and Quality ImprovementUnderstand where your current testing approach needs attention.
A review of an agreed product or delivery area. The scope does not imply exhaustive product testing or implementation.
From A$5,000 + GST
Discuss this service : Testing Health CheckCheck how one AI use case responds when accuracy, information and oversight matter.
One use case, planned around 20 delivery hours over two elapsed weeks, subject to access and capacity. No legal advice, penetration testing or safety certification.
From A$10,000 + GST
Discuss this service : AI Quality and Readiness AssessmentExperienced test leadership to help your people plan and coordinate delivery.
Days, responsibilities and availability are agreed in advance. Specialist advice outside the agreed testing scope is excluded.
From A$1,100/day + GST
Discuss this service : Test Management and Quality AdvisoryAll prices are starting prices in Australian dollars, excluding GST. Scope, availability and the final fee are agreed before work begins. Support is scheduled to an agreed time allocation.
For small and medium Australian businesses with an AI tool in use, in a pilot or nearly ready to launch.
Your AI drafts a refund response. Does it follow your policy, or promise something your team can’t deliver?
Check accuracy and approval.A staff member asks your internal assistant a question. Can it point to a current source and admit when it doesn’t know?
Check sources and uncertainty.Your tool summarises a customer document. Does it preserve the important details, and who can see the information?
Check completeness and access.The assessment focuses on one agreed system or use case. We confirm fit, access and scope before you commit.
A defined scope, a fixed fee and findings
you can use to make a decision.
Targeted checks using agreed inputs: routine requests, wrong answers, sensitive information and when a person should step in.
Observed behaviour, supporting examples and the implications for your business.
The issues to address first, including where to require human review or restrict use.
Recommended actions in priority order, a findings discussion and one consolidated revision round.
Business-wide AI inventories, legal advice, certification, penetration testing, remediation or implementation, and ongoing monitoring are excluded. Further systems, deeper investigation or additional revision rounds are separately quoted. Checks are targeted and agreed in advance; findings apply to the scope and evidence reviewed.
An example of how a test becomes a finding, a decision and a recommended action.
The assistant finds routine answers, but missing policy information can lead to confident, unsupported responses.
When an answer cannot be grounded in an approved source, route the request to a person before it is used.
Example decision support, based on a limited agreed scope. This is not a certification or a guarantee of future performance.
Check REL-03 · Missing information · Fictional input
“Can I approve a refund above the standard limit?”
The assistant said a manager could approve it, although the supplied policy contained no exception rule.
State that the available policy does not answer the question and refer the request to the designated owner.
Require a source for policy advice and send unsupported answers for human review. Retest with agreed missing-information scenarios.
One illustrative scenario. It does not imply a measured failure rate.
Example recommendations for the fictional business. Implementation is outside the assessment scope.
Business owner: keep human approval for policy advice, name an escalation owner and restrict sensitive inputs.
Tool manager: add source checks, document information flows and establish a repeatable set of review scenarios.
Business owner and tool manager: retest the priority issues and decide whether wider use is appropriate.
Want to see the whole shape of the deliverable?
Open the example assessment ↗Illustrative report · Opens in a new tab · PrintableWould you spot the mistake in an AI answer?
Try three simple examples. Read a business rule, choose yes or no, and see why.We bring your use case, sources and agreed examples together to check reliability, information handling and human oversight.
Observe. Record. Explain.
What happened and why it matters.
What needs your attention first.
Recommended actions and next decisions.
Check routine requests, incorrect answers, missing information and conflicts with approved sources.
Ask about a refund exception absent from the supplied policy. Does the tool acknowledge the gap or invent an approval rule?
My background is in testing, test management and quality engineering. Through QVOS, I help businesses plan testing, coordinate end-to-end and user acceptance testing, and make sense of software and AI quality risks.
I bring testing work and stakeholder conversations together: what needs checking, what the evidence shows and what the team should address next. For AI tools, that includes the answers they give, the information they handle and when a person should step in.
You work directly with me, from agreeing what to check to discussing the findings. You’ll receive clear evidence, practical priorities and a plan for what to improve.
Say hello to Adrian ↗Test management · End-to-end testing · UAT · AI quality
Start with one agreed engagement. The work is planned around your priorities and available capacity.Tell Adrian what you are delivering, what is uncertain and what your team needs help with. We agree a suitable service, practical scope, availability and final fee before any work begins.
Each price is a starting point for a scoped engagement, not an unlimited commitment. The proposal sets out the time allocation, deliverables, exclusions and final fee. Ongoing support and advisory days are scheduled by agreement; additional work is separately quoted.
Yes — the assessment is designed for one system already in use, in a pilot, or nearly ready to launch. It needs to be available for the agreed checks. If you’re still choosing an idea or tool, email Adrian to discuss whether this is the right starting point.
Conversations with the business owner and tool manager, relevant documentation, agreed representative inputs and suitable access to the system. Access, information handling and practical responsibilities are agreed before testing begins.
We can agree on synthetic or de-identified examples where they suit the checks. Please don’t send sensitive material in an initial enquiry. Any necessary access, sharing, storage and deletion arrangements are discussed as part of the engagement scope.
No. It provides evidence and recommendations within an agreed scope. It is not legal advice, a compliance determination, certification or a guarantee of safety. You remain responsible for decisions about use and any specialist advice needed.
The fixed-fee assessment identifies and prioritises improvements. Remediation, implementation, ongoing monitoring, additional systems and deeper investigations are outside this package and need a separate agreement.
We discuss the findings and your 90-day roadmap. One consolidated revision round is included. You can use the recommendations with your own team or suppliers, and discuss separately scoped support if needed.
Tell me what you’re delivering, what concerns you and where you need support.
I’ll review your enquiry and arrange a conversation about fit, scope and availability.
Enquire about software testing or advisory ↗
An enquiry does not commit you to an engagement. Work starts after scope, fee and dates are agreed.